Washington — Senator made a major setback on the Democratic Party’s plan to use a $ 3.5 trillion social policy bill to pave the way for the citizenship of an estimated 8 million undocumented migrants.
“The policy changes in this proposal far outweigh the budget implications of it and are not appropriate for inclusion in the settlement,” said Elizabeth McDonough, a senator and arbitrator of her own rules. Stated. Of her decision obtained by the New York Times.
Democrats sought to give legal status to undocumented people brought to the United States as children, known as Dreamers. Immigrants who have been granted temporary protection status for humanitarian reasons. Nearly one million agricultural workers. And millions of people who are considered “key workers”.
Under this proposal, undocumented immigrants are eligible to become US citizens if they pass background checks and health checks and, among other requirements, pay a fee of $ 1,500. The plan also regained at least 226,000 visas that were unused in the previous year due to “Covid-19 or bureaucratic delays”, allowing more visas to be issued.
The Democratic Party wanted to include immigration reviews in its drastic legislation to expand its social safety net. It plans to train muscles under a rapid process known as reconciliation that protects it from Republican filibuster. It will test the scope of Senate rules that require that all measures contained in the settlement bill have a direct impact on federal spending and revenue.
McDonough’s decision is just advice, but some Democratic senators say they will hesitate to dismiss her. She did not immediately respond to the request for comment.
Budget costs from changes in immigration law have affected medical benefits, medical spending and tax credits, exceeding $ 139 billion over a decade, according to preliminary figures from the Parliamentary Budget Department. Democrats predict that the promotion of legalization will add $ 1.5 trillion to the US economy and create more than 400,000 jobs over the next decade.
Republicans argue that immigration reviews are only tangently relevant to the budget.
“Why people endanger their lives to come to this country-to escape religious and political persecution, famine, war, indescribable violence, and lack of opportunity in their home country-to measure in federal dollars. You can’t, “writes a member of parliament.
She said that “legal changes to pave the way” to the legal status of millions of undocumented migrants was “a tremendous permanent policy change that would diminish its impact on the budget.” Claimed to be.
Immigrant advocates plan to renew their immigration registration in case parliamentarians do not rule in their favor, the process by which immigrants become legal permanent residents based on their long-standing presence in the country, etc. I have prepared some backup plans.
Kelly Talbot, deputy director of the immigration hub, said immigration advocates would not give up trying to change the law.
“This is not the end of the process,” she said in a statement. “As I said before, this isn’t a one-time thing. We always knew this would be before and after we had to offer some options. What we know. Is true. The road to permanent residence and citizenship has a huge impact on budgets, bipartisan support, and above all, is important to America’s recovery. “