Nick Clegg is the main cause behind the polarization that caused the U.S. Capitol riot in January, a few days before former employees blamed social networks for riots by amplifying hatred and false information. Tried to soften the claim that is Facebook.
Former Deputy Prime Minister and Liberal Democratic Party leader, now Facebook’s Vice President of Policy and Public Relations, sent a 1,500-word note to staff last Friday about Francis Hogen’s planned “misleading” accusations. I warned.According to a TV interview on Sunday New York Times..
Haugen, a former product manager on Facebook’s civil integrity team, said the platform’s decision to close her division shortly after the declaration of the U.S. presidential election in November led to the death of five people in a parliamentary raid. He said he paved the way.
Prior to the interview, Craig tried to downplay Hogen’s claim, saying that the increase in US political polarization was “decades” ago in social media.
“The growing polarization has been the subject of serious academic research in recent years. In fact, there is not much consensus,” he told workers.
“But the evidence there simply doesn’t support the idea that Facebook, or more generally social media, is the main cause of polarization.”
Haughen, who joined the company in 2019, conducted an internal survey The Wall Street Journal Facebook claims to have done extensive research on the negative effects of Instagram on young users, especially teenage girls, but publicly downplays its importance.
Due to a backlash against the report, Instagram suspended a version of Instagram for people under the age of 13 last week.
She told CBS 60 minutes By shutting down Facebook’s “again and again … showing that it chooses profit over safety” program, and its citizens’ team of integrity, she thought: You need to invest to make Facebook not dangerous. “
“No one on Facebook is malicious, but the incentives are off, right?” She said.
“Facebook makes more money the more content it consumes. People enjoy engaging with those that elicit emotional reactions. And the more anger they are exposed to, the more angry they are. , They interact more and consume more. “
Facebook recognizes and can make greater efforts to prevent disinformation across the platform, but prioritizes engagement and advertising revenue over user safety, she said. Employees who expressed concern about the amplification algorithm were ignored, he added.
“Facebook spends less time on the site, clicks less ads, and changes its algorithms more securely. [Facebook] You’ll make less money, “she continued.
“There was a conflict of interest between what’s good for the general public and what’s good for Facebook. Facebook optimizes for its own benefit, such as making more money over and over again. Was selected. “
A Facebook spokesperson said:
“We continue to make significant improvements to address the spread of false information and harmful content. It is not true to encourage bad content and suggest doing nothing.
“If there were studies that identified accurate solutions to these complex challenges, the technology industry, government, and society would have solved them long ago.”