Luke Schaefer, a professor at the University of Michigan, told Times columnist Nicholas Christophe that the child’s advantage in law is “the most transformative thing.” My colleague Jason Deparley, who has lived in poverty for many years, writes that “the policy revolution takes place in the benefit of the child.” (Jason goes into more detail in today’s episode of The Daily.)
The Center for Poverty and Social Policy in Colombia estimates that the law will reduce child poverty to about 14 percent this year. The biggest drop would be for black and Hispanic children.
What about the unintended consequences?
The idea of child welfare has garnered the support of both progressives and conservatives. Many on the political left see it as a way to reduce economic inequality and increase opportunities. Jason explains his political rights:
Liberals say they allow parents to use money when choosing money, such as targeted help such as food stamps. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Social conservatives have noted that this benefits parents at home, who are excluded from work-oriented programs such as childcare.
Christopher Buskirk, editor of the American publication Greatness, says young conservatives are particularly supportive of the idea. He explains that the result of the brutal recession in real wage growth that began in the 1970s was people under the age of 0. ”
The most common criticism is that the scheme is of a welfare nature which may encourage people to get married or get a job. “Monthly cash payments should only be made in the workplace,” writes Oren Cass, founder of American Compass Policy Group, in a Times Opinion article. (Cass makes exceptions for parents who are recently unemployed and taking leave after the birth of a child.)
But the evidence suggests that these concerns may be largely theoretical. Britain benefits from changes in children Increased Employment in single mothers, Waldfogel said. And when a panel of U.S. experts reviewed research from the National Academy of Sciences, it found that the universal child benefit would be “negligible” on employment.